Nigerian vs Sierra Leonean Family Households
COMPARE
Nigerian
Sierra Leonean
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Nigerians
Sierra Leoneans
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
11.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
11.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nigerian vs Sierra Leonean Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,466,874 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 63.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,352,562 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 63.9%, a difference of 0.010%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nigerian | Sierra Leonean |
| Minimum | 41.2% | 55.9% |
| Maximum | 85.2% | 87.8% |
| Range | 44.1% | 31.8% |
| Mean | 67.1% | 67.7% |
| Median | 66.9% | 65.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.4% | 60.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.6% | 72.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Nigerians and Sierra Leoneans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Iranian (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Norwegian (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
| Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |