Japanese vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Households
COMPARE
Japanese
Immigrants from the Azores
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Japanese
Immigrants from the Azores
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,074,128 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,257,310 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.39%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Immigrants from the Azores |
| Minimum | 39.1% | 54.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 60.9% | 45.1% |
| Mean | 66.2% | 70.1% |
| Median | 66.6% | 69.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.5% | 64.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.9% | 75.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Immigrants from the Azores by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Immigrants from South America (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Yaqui (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Puget Sound Salish (65.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |