Immigrants from Thailand vs Zimbabwean Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Zimbabwean
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Zimbabweans
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
9.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
24.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Zimbabwean Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,927,069 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342 and weighted average of 63.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,192,017 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019 and weighted average of 64.1%, a difference of 0.38%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 38.4% | 45.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 92.9% |
| Range | 61.6% | 47.3% |
| Mean | 66.2% | 67.1% |
| Median | 64.4% | 65.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.4% | 59.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.7% | 73.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Zimbabweans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Sierra Leonean (63.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Arab (64.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Lithuanian (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), French (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Paiute (64.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from North America (64.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Zimbabweans | 24.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 64.1% |
| Arabs | 24.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 64.1% |
| Lithuanians | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 64.0% |
| French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
| Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
| Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
| Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
| Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
| Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |