Immigrants from North America vs Sierra Leonean Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from North America
Sierra Leonean
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from North America
Sierra Leoneans
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
20.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
11.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North America vs Sierra Leonean Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,193,298 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322 and weighted average of 64.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,352,562 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 63.9%, a difference of 0.23%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from North America | Sierra Leonean |
| Minimum | 37.5% | 55.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 87.8% |
| Range | 62.5% | 31.8% |
| Mean | 65.7% | 67.7% |
| Median | 63.1% | 65.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 54.1% | 60.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.4% | 72.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.3% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America and Sierra Leoneans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Canada (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Slavic (64.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Paiute (64.0%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Lithuanians | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 64.0% |
| French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
| Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
| Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
| Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
| Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
| Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |