Immigrants from Bahamas vs Sierra Leonean Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Sierra Leonean
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Bahamas
Sierra Leoneans
63.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
4.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
11.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Sierra Leonean Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,610,461 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 63.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,352,562 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 63.9%, a difference of 0.36%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas | Sierra Leonean |
| Minimum | 45.4% | 55.9% |
| Maximum | 87.2% | 87.8% |
| Range | 41.8% | 31.8% |
| Mean | 64.6% | 67.7% |
| Median | 63.6% | 65.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.9% | 60.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.5% | 72.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas and Sierra Leoneans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Immigrants from Hungary (63.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (63.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (63.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (63.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Belarus (63.7%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (63.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Shoshone (63.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (63.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
| French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |