Immigrants from Jordan vs Luxembourger Single Father Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Luxembourger
Single Father Households
Single Father Households Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Luxembourgers
2.2%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Luxembourger Single Father Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,756,451 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,992,670 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%.
Single Father Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 0.55% |
| Maximum | 9.5% | 5.9% |
| Range | 9.3% | 5.3% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 0.98% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 0.97% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Luxembourgers by Single Father Households
In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Polish (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (2.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Taiwanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Serbian (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from England (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Laotian (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nepal (2.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Brazilian (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), British (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Households |
| Moroccans | 96.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Jordanians | 96.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.8 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Serbians | 96.8 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 96.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 96.6 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Poles | 96.5 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Taiwanese | 96.3 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 95.1 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Syrians | 94.8 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Chileans | 94.5 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Austrians | 94.2 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| West Indians | 94.1 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Brazilians | 92.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| British | 92.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Laotians | 92.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 92.3 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 92.1 /100 | #143 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 90.7 /100 | #144 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 90.2 /100 | #145 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 89.8 /100 | #146 | Excellent 2.2% |