Immigrants from El Salvador vs Immigrants from Chile Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from El Salvador
Immigrants from Chile
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from El Salvador
Immigrants from Chile
67.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
76.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Immigrants from Chile Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,711,776 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 67.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,601,267 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.617 and weighted average of 64.6%, a difference of 3.8%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from El Salvador | Immigrants from Chile |
| Minimum | 51.1% | 33.3% |
| Maximum | 95.0% | 77.8% |
| Range | 43.8% | 44.5% |
| Mean | 70.2% | 65.2% |
| Median | 69.5% | 66.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 66.4% | 62.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.9% | 69.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 8.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Mexican American Indian (67.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Tsimshian (67.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Peruvian (67.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Tohono O'odham (67.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Salvadoran (67.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Peruvians | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Mexican American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 67.0% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 67.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 66.6% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 66.6% |
| Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Apache | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Sioux (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (64.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and Syrian (64.5%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
| South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
| Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
| Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
| Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
| Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |
| Scottish | 70.9 /100 | #152 | Good 64.5% |
| Swedes | 69.8 /100 | #153 | Good 64.5% |
| Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |