Immigrants from Chile vs German Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
German
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Germans
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
76.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
65.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs German Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,601,267 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.617 and weighted average of 64.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,609,417 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Germans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 0.18%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | German |
| Minimum | 33.3% | 51.4% |
| Maximum | 77.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 44.5% | 48.6% |
| Mean | 65.2% | 68.1% |
| Median | 66.8% | 65.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.6% | 63.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.7% | 68.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Germans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Sioux (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (64.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and Syrian (64.5%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Germans are Canadian (64.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Lebanese (64.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Moldova (64.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (64.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and Uruguayan (64.5%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
| South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
| Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
| Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
| Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
| Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |
| Scottish | 70.9 /100 | #152 | Good 64.5% |
| Swedes | 69.8 /100 | #153 | Good 64.5% |
| Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
| Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |