Immigrants from Chile vs Welsh Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Welsh
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Welsh
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
76.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
80.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Welsh Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,601,267 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.617 and weighted average of 64.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,179,951 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630 and weighted average of 64.6%, a difference of 0.070%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Welsh |
| Minimum | 33.3% | 35.9% |
| Maximum | 77.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 44.5% | 64.1% |
| Mean | 65.2% | 72.8% |
| Median | 66.8% | 68.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.6% | 64.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.7% | 82.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 17.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 16.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 16.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Welsh by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Sioux (64.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (64.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Romanian (64.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and Syrian (64.5%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Czechoslovakian (64.6%, a difference of 0.040%), South American Indian (64.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Romania (64.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Delaware (64.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Sioux (64.6%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
| South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
| Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
| Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |
| Romanians | 75.3 /100 | #150 | Good 64.5% |
| Syrians | 75.2 /100 | #151 | Good 64.5% |
| Scottish | 70.9 /100 | #152 | Good 64.5% |
| Swedes | 69.8 /100 | #153 | Good 64.5% |
| Austrians | 68.5 /100 | #154 | Good 64.5% |
| Uruguayans | 67.7 /100 | #155 | Good 64.5% |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |