Arab vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,135,019 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,619,096 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354 and weighted average of 28.0%, a difference of 0.010%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Arab	Immigrants from Middle Africa
Minimum	10.0%	16.1%
Maximum	71.9%	45.8%
Range	61.9%	29.7%
Mean	30.8%	28.6%
Median	28.6%	28.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.7%	26.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	33.0%	30.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	4.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.4%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.4%	4.7%

Demographics Similar to Arabs and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are South American Indian (28.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Tohono O'odham (28.0%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), South American Indian (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Tohono O'odham (28.0%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 28.1%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%
Europeans	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 27.8%