Dominican vs South African Family Households
COMPARE
Dominican
South African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Dominicans
South Africans
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dominican vs South African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,767,002 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Dominicans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 63.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,542,946 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 63.4%, a difference of 0.090%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Dominican | South African |
Minimum | 45.8% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 82.4% | 96.0% |
Range | 36.6% | 56.0% |
Mean | 64.7% | 68.7% |
Median | 64.9% | 65.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.9% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.7% | 81.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 19.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Dominicans and South Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Dominicans are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ghana (63.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Eastern European (63.4%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |