Chickasaw vs Puget Sound Salish Single Father Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Puget Sound Salish
Single Father Households
Single Father Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Puget Sound Salish
2.8%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Puget Sound Salish Single Father Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,211,099 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,042,522 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.220 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 2.4%.

Single Father Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Puget Sound Salish |
| Minimum | 0.57% | 0.46% |
| Maximum | 6.8% | 5.8% |
| Range | 6.3% | 5.3% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 2.9% |
| Median | 3.1% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.9% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Puget Sound Salish by Single Father Households
In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Japanese (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Cree (2.8%, a difference of 0.59%), Malaysian (2.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and Lumbee (2.8%, a difference of 0.97%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Tlingit-Haida (2.7%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Cambodia (2.7%, a difference of 0.52%), Blackfeet (2.7%, a difference of 0.56%), Central American Indian (2.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and Immigrants from Cuba (2.7%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Households |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Malaysians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 2.8% |