Bangladeshi vs Ute Currently Married
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Ute
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Bangladeshis
Ute
43.7%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.9%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Ute Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,443,352 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192 and weighted average of 43.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,668,599 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.482 and weighted average of 43.9%, a difference of 0.45%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Ute |
| Minimum | 29.3% | 21.0% |
| Maximum | 72.2% | 77.2% |
| Range | 42.9% | 56.2% |
| Mean | 45.5% | 46.6% |
| Median | 44.3% | 48.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 39.0% | 37.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.8% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 16.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Ute by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from Cuba (43.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Sudanese (43.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (43.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (43.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Latin America (43.8%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Africa (43.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Shoshone (44.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (43.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Yakama (44.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Latin America (43.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 44.2% |
| Blackfeet | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 44.2% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.1% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 44.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 44.0% |
| Yakama | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 44.0% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 44.0% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Ute | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.5% |