Sierra Leonean vs South American Indian No Schooling Completed
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
South American Indian
No Schooling Completed
No Schooling Completed Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
South American Indians
2.3%
NO SCHOOLING COMPLETED
4.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
NO SCHOOLING COMPLETED
11.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sierra Leonean vs South American Indian No Schooling Completed Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,108,801 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of population with no schooling in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,141,114 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with no schooling in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.419 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 3.3%.

No Schooling Completed Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sierra Leonean | South American Indian |
Minimum | 0.44% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 5.7% | 3.3% |
Range | 5.3% | 3.1% |
Mean | 2.1% | 1.4% |
Median | 2.0% | 1.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 0.77% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 0.79% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 0.78% |
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans and South American Indians by No Schooling Completed
In terms of no schooling completed, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Sudanese (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Tohono O'odham (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Subsaharan African (2.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Sudan (2.3%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Native/Alaskan (2.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.3%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Schooling Completed |
Bahamians | 11.6 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
South American Indians | 11.0 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 11.0 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 10.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 10.0 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 8.8 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 8.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.3% |
Ute | 8.2 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.3% |
Samoans | 8.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 7.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.3% |
Tongans | 6.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Syria | 6.6 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 6.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.3% |
Senegalese | 5.6 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 5.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 5.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 4.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 2.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 4.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 2.3% |
Sudanese | 4.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 2.3% |
Sierra Leoneans | 4.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 2.3% |