Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Australia Vision Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Australia
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Australia
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Australia Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,201,681 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,117,952 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 0.69%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Australia |
| Minimum | 0.38% | 0.16% |
| Maximum | 6.8% | 12.7% |
| Range | 6.4% | 12.6% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 3.1% |
| Median | 2.0% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from Australia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Bhutanese (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Cypriot (2.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Turkey (1.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Egypt (1.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Luxembourger (1.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and Bhutanese (2.0%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |