Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Serbia Vision Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Serbia
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Serbia
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Serbia Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,201,681 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,728,789 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Serbia |
| Minimum | 0.38% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 6.8% | 5.5% |
| Range | 6.4% | 5.1% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Median | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.72% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 0.94% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 0.94% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from Serbia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Bhutanese (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Cypriot (2.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Laotian (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Afghan (2.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |