Creek vs Immigrants from Australia Vision Disability
COMPARE
Creek
 Immigrants from Australia
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Creek
Immigrants from Australia
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Immigrants from Australia Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,415,520 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,117,952 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 64.5%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Immigrants from Australia | 
| Minimum | 0.78% | 0.16% | 
| Maximum | 11.5% | 12.7% | 
| Range | 10.8% | 12.6% | 
| Mean | 4.5% | 3.1% | 
| Median | 3.8% | 2.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 1.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 3.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 1.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 2.5% | 
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Creek by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Turkey (1.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Egypt (1.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Luxembourger (1.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and Bhutanese (2.0%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% | 
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% | 
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% | 
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% | 
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |