Yup'ik vs Osage Vision Disability
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Osage
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Yup'ik
Osage
2.7%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Osage Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,951,250 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,791,636 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 0.63%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Osage |
| Minimum | 0.88% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 8.3% | 5.7% |
| Range | 7.4% | 4.9% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 3.2% |
| Median | 2.7% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.3% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik and Osage by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Shoshone (2.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Alaska Native (2.7%, a difference of 1.1%), Inupiat (2.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Potawatomi (2.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and American (2.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Shoshone (2.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Inupiat (2.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Potawatomi (2.6%, a difference of 1.3%), American (2.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Alaska Native (2.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 2.9% |