Shoshone vs Osage Vision Disability
COMPARE
Shoshone
Osage
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Shoshone
Osage
2.7%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.7%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Osage Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,614,475 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.202 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,791,636 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116 and weighted average of 2.7%, a difference of 0.43%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Shoshone | Osage |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 7.8% | 5.7% |
| Range | 6.6% | 4.9% |
| Mean | 3.6% | 3.2% |
| Median | 3.4% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and Osage by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Yup'ik (2.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Alaska Native (2.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Inupiat (2.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Potawatomi (2.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and American (2.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Yup'ik (2.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Inupiat (2.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Potawatomi (2.6%, a difference of 1.3%), American (2.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Alaska Native (2.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% |