Yup'ik vs Immigrants from South Africa Female Disability
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Immigrants from South Africa
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Yup'ik
Immigrants from South Africa
11.6%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Immigrants from South Africa Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,957,133 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.100 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,307,950 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.813 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.52%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Immigrants from South Africa |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 25.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 20.7% | 98.2% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 17.8% |
| Median | 12.3% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 17.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 17.5% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik and Immigrants from South Africa by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Immigrants from Denmark (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (11.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Poland (11.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Vietnamese (11.6%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Eritrea (11.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Sierra Leonean (11.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Jordan (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.8 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 99.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Yup'ik | 99.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Vietnamese | 99.5 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.6% |