Vietnamese vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Vietnamese
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Vietnamese
Immigrants from Nicaragua
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
47.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
43.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Vietnamese vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,721,676 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,322,252 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.17%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Vietnamese | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 10.1% | 22.6% |
Range | 9.0% | 20.9% |
Mean | 5.8% | 6.8% |
Median | 5.6% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Vietnamese and Immigrants from Nicaragua by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from England (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Canada (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from England (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |