Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Ireland Disability
COMPARE
Uruguayan
 Immigrants from Ireland
 Disability
Disability Comparison
Uruguayans
Immigrants from Ireland
11.2%
DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Ireland Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,784,951 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,775,613 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 1.5%.
 
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Uruguayan | Immigrants from Ireland | 
| Minimum | 8.6% | 3.4% | 
| Maximum | 34.0% | 31.4% | 
| Range | 25.4% | 28.0% | 
| Mean | 14.6% | 11.7% | 
| Median | 12.4% | 11.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 9.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.3% | 13.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 3.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 4.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 4.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans and Immigrants from Ireland by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Bhutanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Morocco (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Eastern European (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ireland are Immigrants from Jordan (11.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Poland (11.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Chilean (11.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Switzerland (11.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (11.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #79  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.3 /100 | #80  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.1 /100 | #81  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Chileans | 99.1 /100 | #82  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.0 /100 | #83  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.0 /100 | #84  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 98.9 /100 | #85  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Russia | 98.9 /100 | #86  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Palestinians | 98.9 /100 | #87  | Exceptional 11.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.5 /100 | #88  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Immigrants | South Africa | 98.2 /100 | #89  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.1 /100 | #90  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.1 /100 | #91  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Ecuadorians | 98.0 /100 | #92  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 98.0 /100 | #93  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.8 /100 | #94  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Eastern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #95  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 97.7 /100 | #96  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Bhutanese | 97.4 /100 | #97  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Uruguayans | 97.4 /100 | #98  | Exceptional 11.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #99  | Exceptional 11.2%  |