Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cuban Male Disability
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Cuban
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Cubans
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
74.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cuban Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,818,350 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.222 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,227,297 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.146 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.72%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Cuban |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 20.5% | 38.6% |
| Range | 17.4% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 10.6% |
| Median | 10.8% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians and Cubans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Europe (11.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Nigerian (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from Guatemala (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Albania (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Sudanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
| South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Moroccans | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Kenyans | 78.1 /100 | #144 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 78.0 /100 | #145 | Good 11.0% |
| Koreans | 77.5 /100 | #146 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 77.3 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Sudanese | 77.1 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 76.4 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 75.1 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Cubans | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 74.4 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 73.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.1% |