Swiss vs Croatian Female Disability
COMPARE
Swiss
Croatian
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Swiss
Croatians
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
14.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
20.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Croatian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,961,657 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,696,225 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.34%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Croatian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 5.2% |
| Maximum | 28.6% | 64.3% |
| Range | 27.3% | 59.1% |
| Mean | 13.0% | 19.5% |
| Median | 12.1% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 21.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Croatians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Ute (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Panamanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Cuba (12.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zaire (12.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Barbados (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Somali (12.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Mexican American Indians | 24.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 24.7 /100 | #199 | Fair 12.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 22.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 12.3% |
| Chinese | 22.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 12.3% |
| Somalis | 21.5 /100 | #202 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 21.1 /100 | #203 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 20.9 /100 | #204 | Fair 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 20.5 /100 | #205 | Fair 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 12.4% |
| Croatians | 20.2 /100 | #207 | Fair 12.4% |
| Basques | 17.5 /100 | #208 | Poor 12.4% |
| Mexicans | 15.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 12.4% |
| Swiss | 14.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 14.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 12.4% |
| Ute | 14.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.5 /100 | #213 | Poor 12.4% |
| Panamanians | 13.5 /100 | #214 | Poor 12.4% |
| Samoans | 13.4 /100 | #215 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 13.3 /100 | #216 | Poor 12.4% |
| British | 12.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 12.5 /100 | #218 | Poor 12.4% |