Sudanese vs South African Male Disability
COMPARE
Sudanese
South African
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Sudanese
South Africans
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
77.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
81.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs South African Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,141,954 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,590,861 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.40%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | South African |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 22.1% | 25.0% |
| Range | 16.7% | 22.3% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 11.6% |
| Median | 11.1% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and South Africans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Croatia (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Costa Rican (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Kenyan (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Nigerian (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sudan (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Europe (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
| South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Moroccans | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Kenyans | 78.1 /100 | #144 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 78.0 /100 | #145 | Good 11.0% |
| Koreans | 77.5 /100 | #146 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 77.3 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Sudanese | 77.1 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 76.4 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 75.1 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Cubans | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 74.4 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 73.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.1% |