Subsaharan African vs Chinese Disability Age 5 to 17
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Chinese
Disability Age 5 to 17
Disability Age 5 to 17 Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Chinese
6.2%
DISABILITY AGE 5 TO 17
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.7%
DISABILITY AGE 5 TO 17
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Chinese Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,132,058 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,726,058 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.523 and weighted average of 4.7%, a difference of 31.2%.
Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 0.88% |
| Maximum | 28.8% | 15.0% |
| Range | 26.3% | 14.1% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 5.4% |
| Median | 6.3% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 5 to 17
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Disability Age 5 to 17
In terms of disability age 5 to 17, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are English (6.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Colville (6.2%, a difference of 0.040%), German (6.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Pima (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 5 to 17 |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.2% |
| English | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Disability Age 5 to 17
In terms of disability age 5 to 17, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Korea (4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.7%, a difference of 0.42%), Arapaho (4.7%, a difference of 0.88%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and Thai (4.7%, a difference of 0.91%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 5 to 17 |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.8% |