Spanish vs Fijian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Spanish
Fijian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Spanish
Fijians
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish vs Fijian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,995,316 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,946,313 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 3.5%, a difference of 3.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish | Fijian |
Minimum | 0.21% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 35.7% | 7.6% |
Range | 35.5% | 5.1% |
Mean | 8.4% | 4.4% |
Median | 6.5% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 5.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish and Fijians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish are Delaware (3.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Sioux (3.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Micronesia (3.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and Chinese (3.7%, a difference of 0.78%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Swiss (3.5%, a difference of 0.39%), European (3.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Czechoslovakian (3.6%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.5% |
Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.5% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 3.5% |
Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 3.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 3.6% |
Danes | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 3.6% |
Basques | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 3.6% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |