Seminole vs Tohono O'odham Disability
COMPARE
Seminole
Tohono O'odham
Disability
Disability Comparison
Seminole
Tohono O'odham
14.9%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Seminole vs Tohono O'odham Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,308,491 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,721,793 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 0.61%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Seminole | Tohono O'odham |
| Minimum | 5.8% | 5.4% |
| Maximum | 34.4% | 63.6% |
| Range | 28.5% | 58.3% |
| Mean | 19.4% | 21.9% |
| Median | 18.9% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 13.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Seminole and Tohono O'odham by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Dutch West Indian (14.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Yuman (14.6%, a difference of 1.7%), Cajun (14.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 0.51%), Dutch West Indian (14.9%, a difference of 0.91%), Yuman (14.6%, a difference of 1.0%), Cajun (14.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and Pueblo (14.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |