Romanian vs Bhutanese Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Romanian
Bhutanese
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Romanians
Bhutanese
16.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Bhutanese Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,876,642 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.358 and weighted average of 16.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,511,378 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221 and weighted average of 16.6%, a difference of 0.090%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Romanian | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 24.0% | 22.9% |
| Range | 21.6% | 18.9% |
| Mean | 14.6% | 15.2% |
| Median | 15.4% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 13.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Bhutanese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Pennsylvania German (16.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Peru (16.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from England (16.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Austrian (16.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Czechoslovakian (16.6%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Austrian (16.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Pennsylvania German (16.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Peru (16.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Venezuela (16.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from England (16.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Soviet Union | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Bhutanese | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Romanians | 99.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Argentineans | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Venezuelans | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 16.6% |
| Ukrainians | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 16.6% |