Pueblo vs Dutch West Indian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Pueblo
Dutch West Indian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Pueblo
Dutch West Indians
7.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pueblo vs Dutch West Indian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,067,140 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 7.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,765,361 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.250 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 7.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pueblo | Dutch West Indian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 28.1% | 27.7% |
| Range | 26.6% | 24.1% |
| Mean | 10.1% | 11.2% |
| Median | 9.1% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Pueblo and Dutch West Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Hopi (7.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Native/Alaskan (7.5%, a difference of 0.98%), Black/African American (7.5%, a difference of 0.99%), Comanche (7.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and Navajo (7.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Colville (8.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 0.92%), Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 1.6%), Chickasaw (8.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |