Central American Indian vs Zimbabwean Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Zimbabwean
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Central American Indians
Zimbabweans
7.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Zimbabwean Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,071,152 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.616 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,176 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 32.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 2.6% | 0.83% |
Maximum | 32.9% | 17.3% |
Range | 30.3% | 16.5% |
Mean | 9.9% | 5.5% |
Median | 7.4% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 6.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Immigrants from Dominican Republic (7.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Ottawa (7.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Shoshone (7.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Blackfeet (7.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Yemen (7.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 7.1% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 7.2% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 7.2% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 7.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 7.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 7.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 7.4% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 7.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |