Malaysian vs Carpatho Rusyn Male Disability
COMPARE
Malaysian
Carpatho Rusyn
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Malaysians
Carpatho Rusyns
11.8%
MALE DISABILITY
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
MALE DISABILITY
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Carpatho Rusyn Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,062,465 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.309 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,870,293 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.524 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 0.39%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 2.1% | 7.0% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 31.1% |
Range | 31.3% | 24.1% |
Mean | 15.0% | 14.4% |
Median | 12.5% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.2% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 16.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Carpatho Rusyns by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Mexican (11.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Dominican (11.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Canada (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from North America (11.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Croatian (11.8%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are U.S. Virgin Islander (11.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Yugoslavian (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from North America (11.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Italian (11.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Japanese | 3.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 11.7% |
Liberians | 3.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 11.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 11.8% |
Austrians | 2.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 11.8% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 2.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 11.8% |
Bermudans | 2.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 11.8% |
Croatians | 2.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 11.8% |
Dominicans | 1.8 /100 | #231 | Tragic 11.8% |
Malaysians | 1.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 11.8% |
Mexicans | 1.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 11.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 1.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 1.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 11.9% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 1.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 11.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 1.3 /100 | #237 | Tragic 11.9% |
Yugoslavians | 1.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 11.9% |
Italians | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 11.9% |
Czechs | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 11.9% |
Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 11.9% |
Northern Europeans | 1.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 11.9% |
Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 11.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.0 /100 | #244 | Tragic 11.9% |