Korean vs Immigrants from Morocco Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Korean
Immigrants from Morocco
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Koreans
Immigrants from Morocco
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Immigrants from Morocco Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,581,293 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Koreans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,910,370 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | Immigrants from Morocco |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 15.2% | 12.4% |
| Range | 13.4% | 11.1% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 5.8% |
| Median | 6.0% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Koreans and Immigrants from Morocco by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Morocco are Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |