Korean vs Immigrants from Western Asia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Korean
Immigrants from Western Asia
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Koreans
Immigrants from Western Asia
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Immigrants from Western Asia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,581,293 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Koreans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,333,266 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.15%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | Immigrants from Western Asia |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 15.2% | 12.5% |
| Range | 13.4% | 9.3% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 6.9% |
| Median | 6.0% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Koreans and Immigrants from Western Asia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |