Kenyan vs Immigrants from Australia Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Kenyan
Immigrants from Australia
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Kenyans
Immigrants from Australia
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kenyan vs Immigrants from Australia Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,082,411 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,025,526 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kenyan | Immigrants from Australia |
| Minimum | 0.23% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 4.1% | 9.3% |
| Range | 3.8% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.6% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.87% | 0.93% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.71% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.70% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Kenyans and Immigrants from Australia by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Immigrants from Serbia (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Latvian (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (2.3%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Lithuania (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Korea (2.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sweden (2.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Kenyans | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Australians | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.3% |