Kenyan vs Carpatho Rusyn Vision Disability
COMPARE
Kenyan
Carpatho Rusyn
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Kenyans
Carpatho Rusyns
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
92.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kenyan vs Carpatho Rusyn Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,152,432 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kenyans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,850,680 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.50%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dd03/3dd03e9569f4714312a98982d9d2b44f8991f43d" alt="Kenyan vs Carpatho Rusyn Vision Disability"
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kenyan | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 0.99% | 0.42% |
Maximum | 4.9% | 7.5% |
Range | 3.9% | 7.1% |
Mean | 2.1% | 2.5% |
Median | 2.0% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.58% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.84% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.83% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Kenyans and Carpatho Rusyns by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Kenyans are Croatian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Ugandan (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Polish (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Denmark (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Immigrants from Italy (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (2.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Danish (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Korean (2.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Estonians | 95.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Greeks | 95.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Albanians | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Austria | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Italy | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 94.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Swedes | 94.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Danes | 94.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Koreans | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chileans | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 93.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Peruvians | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 92.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |