Immigrants from Thailand vs Barbadian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Barbadian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Barbadians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
20.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
5.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Barbadian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,876,708 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,266,636 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 2.4%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Barbadian |
Minimum | 0.34% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 7.7% | 4.7% |
Range | 7.3% | 3.7% |
Mean | 2.5% | 2.3% |
Median | 2.2% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 1.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.75% | 1.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 0.81% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 0.81% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Barbadians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from El Salvador (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Zaire (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Dutch (2.2%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Portuguese (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Nigerian (2.3%, a difference of 0.56%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.2%, a difference of 0.77%), and Immigrants from Ghana (2.2%, a difference of 0.91%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |
Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 8.9 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 8.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.2% |
Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 6.1 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.3% |
Barbadians | 5.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.3% |
Portuguese | 4.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.3% |