Inupiat vs Creek Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Inupiat
 Creek
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Inupiat
Creek
4.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Creek Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,332,419 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,433,224 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 7.9%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Creek | 
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.6% | 
| Maximum | 19.6% | 13.4% | 
| Range | 17.3% | 11.8% | 
| Mean | 7.0% | 6.1% | 
| Median | 6.1% | 5.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.1% | 7.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 2.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 2.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 2.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Creek by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 1.8%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 2.1%), Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 0.71%), Aleut (4.3%, a difference of 2.0%), Chickasaw (4.5%, a difference of 2.5%), Dutch West Indian (4.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% | 
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 5.8% |