Immigrants from Guatemala vs Fijian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
 Fijian
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Fijians
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Fijian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,092,792 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,940,410 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.424 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.83%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Fijian | 
| Minimum | 0.29% | 1.7% | 
| Maximum | 14.0% | 5.1% | 
| Range | 13.7% | 3.3% | 
| Mean | 2.6% | 2.8% | 
| Median | 2.4% | 2.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 3.3% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.78% | 1.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 0.84% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 0.82% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala and Fijians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Haitian (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Japanese (2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Micronesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Jamaican (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Belize (2.4%, a difference of 0.28%), White/Caucasian (2.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and British West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% |