Immigrants from Europe vs Greek Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Europe
 Greek
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Europe
Greeks
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
87.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
79.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Europe vs Greek Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,017,856 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.817 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,531,888 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.622 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.83%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Europe | Greek | 
| Minimum | 0.74% | 1.5% | 
| Maximum | 88.9% | 50.0% | 
| Range | 88.1% | 48.5% | 
| Mean | 12.3% | 11.2% | 
| Median | 6.2% | 8.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.2% | 11.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 6.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.4% | 9.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.3% | 9.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Europe and Greeks by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Europe are Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Maltese (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Lithuanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131  | Excellent 5.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150  | Excellent 6.0%  | 
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151  | Good 6.0%  |