Immigrants from Chile vs Jordanian Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
 Jordanian
 Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Jordanians
11.0%
DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Jordanian Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,638,436 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,416,962 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.483 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.6%.
 
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Jordanian | 
| Minimum | 4.2% | 3.7% | 
| Maximum | 31.0% | 17.2% | 
| Range | 26.8% | 13.5% | 
| Mean | 12.5% | 10.2% | 
| Median | 10.4% | 10.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 7.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 11.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 2.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 2.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Jordanians by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Bangladesh (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from France (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Sri Lankan (11.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.0%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Spain (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from El Salvador (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Lithuania (10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Salvadoran (10.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from South America (10.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.0% | 
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.0% | 
| Bulgarians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.0% | 
| Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.0% | 
| Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.0% | 
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.0% | 
| Sri Lankans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.0% | 
| Immigrants | France | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.0% | 
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.0% | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.0% | 
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.0% |