Guatemalan vs Mexican Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Mexican
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Guatemalans
Mexicans
17.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Mexican Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,490,798 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,048,688 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 17.8%, a difference of 0.43%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guatemalan | Mexican |
| Minimum | 7.9% | 15.8% |
| Maximum | 36.1% | 20.4% |
| Range | 28.2% | 4.6% |
| Mean | 17.2% | 17.9% |
| Median | 17.5% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 0.90% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 0.75% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 0.75% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Mexicans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Tongan (17.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Panamanian (17.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Osage (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish American Indian (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Mongolian (17.7%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexicans are Paiute (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (17.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Jamaican (17.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Iraqi (17.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Cajun (17.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Marshallese | 2.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 2.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 2.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 2.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Mongolians | 2.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Guatemalans | 2.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Tongans | 2.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Panamanians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Osage | 2.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Spanish American Indians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 1.8 /100 | #236 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Cheyenne | 1.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Cajuns | 1.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Mexicans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Paiute | 1.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.0 /100 | #243 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Jamaicans | 0.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 0.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 17.9% |