Guatemalan vs Mexican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Mexican
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Guatemalans
Mexicans
21.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
298th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Mexican Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,016,848 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 21.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 545,930,969 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.831 and weighted average of 20.9%, a difference of 2.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | Mexican |
Minimum | 1.1% | 11.4% |
Maximum | 73.2% | 54.6% |
Range | 72.1% | 43.2% |
Mean | 31.3% | 23.5% |
Median | 27.6% | 21.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.7% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.9% | 27.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.2% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.3% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Mexicans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Immigrants from Central America (21.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bahamas (21.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Houma (21.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and Indonesian (21.3%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexicans are Hispanic or Latino (21.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Inupiat (20.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from West Indies (20.7%, a difference of 0.59%), Somali (21.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (20.7%, a difference of 0.87%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |