Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Guatemalans
Immigrants from Middle Africa
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
93.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,374,057 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,695,899 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 1.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guatemalan | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
| Minimum | 0.55% | 0.16% |
| Maximum | 6.7% | 8.1% |
| Range | 6.1% | 7.9% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 2.8% |
| Median | 2.7% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.81% | 0.87% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Turkish (2.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Honduran (2.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Chile (2.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Moroccan (2.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Burmese (2.8%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Iranian (2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Morocco (2.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Belizean (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Kuwait (2.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Uruguayan (2.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Belizeans | 96.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 96.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Iranians | 96.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 96.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Uruguayans | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Israelis | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 95.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Burmese | 94.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |