Ghanaian vs Iroquois Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Ghanaian
 Iroquois
 Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Ghanaians
Iroquois
18.3%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.2%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Iroquois Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,691,747 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,276,810 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 18.2%, a difference of 0.45%.
 
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ghanaian | Iroquois | 
| Minimum | 6.5% | 8.7% | 
| Maximum | 32.2% | 66.7% | 
| Range | 25.7% | 58.0% | 
| Mean | 16.7% | 20.3% | 
| Median | 17.1% | 17.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 15.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.8% | 20.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 4.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 10.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 10.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians and Iroquois by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Creek (18.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (18.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (18.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (18.2%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American Indian (18.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Ottawa (18.2%, a difference of 0.070%), British West Indian (18.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (18.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Native/Alaskan (18.1%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability | 
| Bermudans | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 18.1% | 
| Kenyans | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 18.1% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 18.1% | 
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic 18.1% | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic 18.1% | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.1 /100 | #290 | Tragic 18.1% | 
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #291 | Tragic 18.2% | 
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #292 | Tragic 18.2% | 
| Central American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #293 | Tragic 18.2% | 
| British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #294 | Tragic 18.2% | 
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 18.2% | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 18.2% | 
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 18.3% | 
| Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% | 
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.3% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.3% | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.3% | 
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 18.3% | 
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.3% | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.3% | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.3% |