French Canadian vs Aleut Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
French Canadian
Aleut
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
French Canadians
Aleuts
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
85.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
French Canadian vs Aleut Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,569,589 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.235 and weighted average of 17.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,782,027 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.063 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 0.29%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | French Canadian | Aleut |
| Minimum | 4.5% | 5.7% |
| Maximum | 29.5% | 35.8% |
| Range | 24.9% | 30.2% |
| Mean | 15.7% | 15.9% |
| Median | 15.9% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to French Canadians and Aleuts by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Cypriot (17.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Scotch-Irish (17.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (17.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Costa Rican (17.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Syrian (17.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are French (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Chilean (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Carpatho Rusyn (17.0%, a difference of 0.020%), British (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Brazil (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | Chile | 91.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Lebanese | 91.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Israelis | 91.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.9 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Welsh | 90.8 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| French | 90.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Chileans | 89.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Aleuts | 89.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 89.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 17.0% |
| British | 89.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 89.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 88.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 17.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 85.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 17.1% |
| French Canadians | 85.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Cypriots | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |