English vs Native Hawaiian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
English
Native Hawaiian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
English
Native Hawaiians
6.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
English vs Native Hawaiian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 579,179,335 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of English and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.520 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,921,721 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.149 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | English | Native Hawaiian |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 62.2% | 17.8% |
| Range | 60.2% | 15.8% |
| Mean | 11.0% | 6.9% |
| Median | 7.1% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to English and Native Hawaiians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to English are Hmong (6.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Irish (6.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Belize (6.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Aleut (6.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Spanish American Indian (6.5%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Chinese (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and Armenian (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Aleuts | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.4 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Irish | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.6% |
| English | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Hmong | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Nepalese | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.6% |