Danish vs Immigrants from Turkey Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Danish
Immigrants from Turkey
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Danes
Immigrants from Turkey
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Immigrants from Turkey Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,117,294 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,915,047 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.559 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.35%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Danish | Immigrants from Turkey |
Minimum | 0.50% | 0.52% |
Maximum | 8.3% | 24.9% |
Range | 7.8% | 24.4% |
Mean | 2.2% | 3.4% |
Median | 2.0% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.75% | 0.47% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Immigrants from Turkey by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Paraguayan (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Burmese (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Korea (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (2.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Australia (2.3%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Korea (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Australia (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sweden (2.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Burmese (2.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Inupiat | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.3% |