Chippewa vs Osage Disability Age Under 5
COMPARE
Chippewa
 Osage
 Disability Age Under 5
Disability Age Under 5 Comparison
Chippewa
Osage
1.9%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.8%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Osage Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,016,256 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.399 and weighted average of 1.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,230,866 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 1.8%, a difference of 2.9%.
 
Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Osage | 
| Minimum | 0.43% | 0.80% | 
| Maximum | 16.9% | 23.5% | 
| Range | 16.5% | 22.7% | 
| Mean | 4.9% | 6.7% | 
| Median | 3.9% | 2.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 14.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 12.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 7.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 7.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Osage by Disability Age Under 5
In terms of disability age under 5, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are French Canadian (1.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Choctaw (1.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Houma (1.9%, a difference of 0.69%), American (1.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and Dutch West Indian (1.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Sioux (1.8%, a difference of 0.39%), American (1.9%, a difference of 1.7%), Immigrants from Portugal (1.8%, a difference of 1.8%), Houma (1.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and Choctaw (1.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Under 5 | 
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 1.7%  | 
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 1.7%  | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 1.7%  | 
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 1.7%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 1.7%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 1.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Portugal | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 1.8%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 1.8%  | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 1.8%  | 
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 1.9%  | 
| Paraguayans | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 2.0%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 2.0%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 2.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 2.2%  |