Chinese vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Disability Age Under 5
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Disability Age Under 5
Disability Age Under 5 Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
1.1%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.1%
DISABILITY AGE UNDER 5
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,046,332 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 1.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,720,204 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of population with a disability under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 1.1%, a difference of 1.5%.
Disability Age Under 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Sri Lanka |
| Minimum | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Maximum | 4.4% | 4.3% |
| Range | 4.0% | 4.0% |
| Mean | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| Median | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.75% | 1.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 0.97% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.98% | 0.77% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.97% | 0.76% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Disability Age Under 5
In terms of disability age under 5, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Ethiopian (1.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (1.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (1.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Ugandan (1.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Okinawan (1.1%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Jordanian (1.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Burmese (1.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Pakistan (1.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (1.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (1.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Under 5 |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 98.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Burmese | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Jordanians | 98.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 98.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 98.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.1 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| West Indians | 98.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Hmong | 98.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 98.0 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Turks | 98.0 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 97.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 97.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 97.8 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Sudanese | 97.7 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Okinawans | 97.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Ugandans | 97.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 97.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Ethiopians | 97.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 1.1% |
| Albanians | 97.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 1.1% |